I have been getting a lot of questions asking about how to zero out a trust. When you zero out a trust, you remove all of the income from the trust, so that there is no taxable income held by the trust. A trust with taxable income is essentially a tax disaster.
One of my clients passed away last year, and his daughter has been wading through settling his estate. He had set up a living revocable trust and a pour over will which instructed that his assets would be put into the trust and then distributed to his four children.
My client’s daughter (the personal representative and successor trustee) didn’t understand what it meant to zero out the trust. She assumed she had to distribute all the assets by the end of the year. She was worried, because she knew there were expenses associated with her father’s estate that would be payable in the following year. If everything was distributed, no funds would be left to administer the trust.
I explained she only had to zero out the income in the trust each year. She got the concept, but didn’t know what was considered income to the trust.
The father funded his trust with only one piece of property. A number of other assets were added to it after his death. Was everything that moved into the trust from his estate considered “income” to the trust? The answer is no.
The original property in the trust and the assets that poured over into it together are considered the “principal” of the trust. Assets in a trust may generate income, just as your personal assets may generate income. In a revocable trust, all the income passes directly through to the beneficiaries. In an irrevocable trust, income is either kept in the trust or passed through to the beneficiaries. Income kept (accumulated) in the trust is taxed as the trust’s income. Because trust tax rates are so high, beneficiaries will generally be in a lower tax bracket than the trust. Passing the income is nearly always the better choice.
Calculating income for a trust–revocable or irrevocable–is the same as it would be for you as an individual. Before the end of the year, estimate the income and physically pay that out to the beneficiaries per the terms of the trust. The trust gets a deduction for the income that it pays out.
The principal has a basis, just like your assets have a basis. When the assets are sold, there may be an income or loss, just as if you sold them. The basis of the assets in my client’s trust (the property he put in and everything else added after his death) is the fair market value of the asset on the day he died. All of his assets got a “step up” in basis on his death. His assets totaled less than $5.45 million, so there is no federal estate tax. His state had the same limits as the federal estate tax, but there could have been some state estate tax owing if he lived in a different state.
In tax terms, there are two types of trusts: “simple” and “complex.” Simple trusts do not accumulate income and by their terms are required to “pay out” all of the income quarterly or annually, depending upon whether the beneficiaries are required to pay taxes quarterly or annually. Most revocable trusts are simple trusts.
An irrevocable trust could also be a simple trust, if its terms mandate paying out all income to the beneficiaries during the tax year. A simple trust does not generally have a tax ID number (EIN). The beneficiary’s Social Security Number is used whenever the tax ID is requested for a living revocable trust. If both members of a couple are the beneficiaries of a trust and are filing a joint return, it doesn’t matter which one of the SS numbers is used. If there are multiple beneficiaries of a trust (and they cannot file jointly), the trust will need an EIN number of its own.
The standard living revocable trust a person uses for estate planning uses a SS Number for its EIN. However, instantly upon the grantor’s death, the trust changes into an irrevocable trust and the successor trustee will have to get a tax ID number (EIN) for the trust and file a 1041 return at the end of the tax year.
A complex trust can accumulate income. It stands as an independent taxpayer. It is required to get a tax ID number (EIN). It will file a tax return and pay taxes on any income it accumulates. However, the trust can’t afford to accumulate income. Trust tax rates are insane. At a little over $12,000 in total income, the trust’s tax rate kicks in at the highest possible tax rate. That’s 39.6% for the federal income tax plus the state’s maximum income tax. NOT GOOD!
If an EIN has been obtained for a trust, it is required to file a 1041 return and provide K-1s to each beneficiary showing the income distributed to them that year. The beneficiaries then report the income shown on their K-1s as income on their 1040.
Note that if wages are paid to the grantor after his death, they are not considered income to the trust. Those pour over into the trust as assets and are counted as principal. It is the interest earned on assets or return on investments made with trust assets that are considered income to the trust. If the trust sells trust assets above their basis value (their fair market value on the day of the grantor’s death), the difference in the basis and sale price is income to the trust.
It is up to the successor trustee to administer the trust according to the terms of the trust and accumulate or zero out the trust income within each tax period. The trustee has a fiduciary duty to reserve enough of the income and principal to be able to administer the trust and meet its financial obligations, but the trustee does not want to have the trust pay unnecessary taxes. It is usually far cheaper for the beneficiaries to pay the tax on their distribution of income from the trust.
Even though my client’s trust instructs all principal to be distributed to the beneficiaries, the successor trustee needs to keep enough income and principal in the trust to pay the trust’s expenses. If everything were paid out immediately and outstanding debts payable by the estate came up after a complete distribution of the trust assets, the trustee would be liable for the debts and the beneficiaries would probably be liable for that debt up to the amount they received from the estate. No one wants to deal with that mess.
There is a major difference between a simple living revocable trust and its successor irrevocable trust. When funds are “paid out” to the beneficiaries from a living revocable trust, there isn’t an actual transfer of funds from the trust’s bank account to the beneficiary’s bank account. The term “paid out” only required the beneficiary to recognize the income as his or her income. The IRS ignores the trust and considers it a “grantor’s trust.” Trust accounts are considered the beneficiary’s accounts for tax purposes.
In an irrevocable trust created by the death of a revocable trust’s grantor, an actual transfer of funds from the trust bank or brokerage account to the beneficiary will have to be made. It is now a complex trust. The payout needs to occur because the books of the trust will be used to calculate the tax. The trust needs to show that the income is gone. The books of the trust are a different taxpayer’s books. They are not in any way considered the beneficiary’s books. Money actually has to leave the trust’s accounts in order to get the deduction.
One last note: a simple trust will have a January 1 through December 31 tax year. This makes sense because the income will be reported on an individual’s return during that tax year. However, a new irrevocable trust formed by the death of a living revocable trust’s grantor has an option of setting a tax year that ends the month before the month of death one year later. In other words, the month of death becomes the first month of the irrevocable trust’s tax year. This is allowed in order to give more time to settle the estate without having to go into a second tax year. The IRS is stingy, but will give certain allowances and tax breaks if you are willing to die to get them.
P.S. Recently Ben Rucker and I significantly updated my Advanced Tax Tactics course. It walks you through the decisions you need to make all year long in order to save on–and not pay any unnecessary–taxes in the new year.
Regarding “Money actually has to leave the trust’s accounts in order to get the deduction”: in the scenario of the irrevocable trust holding a real estate, where, income is negative (rental income minus expense), and the trust wants to pass the lost to its beneficiary, how does “money leaving the trust account” work?
The loss will be reported on the K-1 given to the beneficiary from the Trust.
What if I have a simple irrevocable trust now funded with 100,000 from a sold property? The property was sold and the money deposited into a trust account. I was told to fill out a 1041 B for the sold property in the trust and put all zeros down, since no interest was made from the property being sold and it remains in trust. Is this correct? What happens when the money is withdrawn by the beneficiary?
What was your basis in the property or how much was the property originally purchased for? If you sold the property for more than your basis then you have income and income is taxed. Either the trust or the beneficiaries is going to need to pay taxes on the income. If you assign the income to the beneficiaries with a K-1 then the beneficiaries will pay the income tax. If you don’t use a K-1 then the trust needs to pay the tax. Just because the money stayed in the trust does not mean there is no tax.
Irrevocable Trust from 2005 established before the donors death in NY state. Donor died in 2016. Only his house and 3 adjacent vacant rural parcels remained in the trust in 2017 and they were all sold. They were titled in the name of the Trustee and the Trust. They were not business properties and there was no income produced during the life of the trust from them. The Schedule D for the 1041 shows a ($21,000.) loss for the sale of the properties all told. Each parcel has an independent appraisal for 2017 and parcels were sold for FMV. (Some vacant land at a profit.) The donor built the house in 2005 and it cost more in 2005 than it was sold for in 2017. (2008 real estate market crash, etc.) It appears in Schedule D (Form 1041) Part 3, I show -$21,000. on line 19 column 2 and 3. On Part 4 of Schedule D, I’m told the Capital Loss Limitation is $3,000. The Trust terminated when the properties were sold according to the Trust documents. Shouldn’t I be able to somehow distribute the full capital loss to the 3 beneficiaries on their K-1’s this year? Following the IRS instructions I’m not seeing how to make that happen. I read that on the K-1 I should show the loss and indicate a certian code but, I’m missing something on the Schedule D because Part 4, line 20 is limited to $3,000. What am I missing? Thanks! PS- It is my understanding that the Trust in 2017 had no income because the properties sold at a loss to what the donors value was when he gave them to the Trust in 2005, correct?
Capital losses can only be transferred to the beneficiaries on the final tax return of the trust. If there are still capital losses that are unused by the trust when it ends, those losses are reported on the K-1’s in Box 11. If it is a short-term capital loss you use the code of B; if it is a long-term capital loss you use the code of C.
What is the treatment of a capital loss on the sale of a personal asset (i.e. residence) that has been transferred to a irrevocable trust, rented back to the grantor and then several years later sold at a loss? Is the loss available for distribution in the final year or as an offset against other capital gains inside the trust or is it considered a personal loss and it evaporates?
Your details are way beyond me. This the kind of thing big accounting firms have to research or have a specialist answer.
My sister would like to plan a trust fund for her son so the latter won’t face a probate case, which is why she has decided to start looking for an estate planning lawyer. Well, you are also right that the irrevocable trust could be passed on to the beneficiaries. Thank you for explaining here the lower tax bracket as well.